Micromanaging - TBM Payroll
It’s Not Micromanaging If You Do It Without Killing Morale
October 31, 2017
Leadership Tips - TBM Payroll, Glens Falls, NY
4 Reasons Your People Can’t Manage Themselves
November 7, 2017
Show all

3 Reports Every Manager Should Have

3 Reports Managers Should Have - TBM Payroll

As a manager, there are many areas of business you need to keep your eyes on. TBM Payroll found this article on 3 important reports every manager should have.

Making sure your employees are in alignment with your organization’s goals will be easier if you track their progress with these 3 reports.

The three reports that every manager should use are part of a reporting system first described on our book, One Page Management. They’re ideal for tracking alignment in an organization. Let’s take a closer look at what those three reports can do for you and your teams.

The Focus Report

The Focus Report shows an employee’s performance as it relates to the actual status of each of the process indicators assigned to them. The “status” of those indicators is the number that shows the result of the indicator in the previous reporting period. For example, suppose the indicator in a scorecard is “percent of customer returns” and the percentage of returns in the month of April was 3 percent. Then, the status for this indicator in your May Focus Report would show that employee’s performance to be 3 percent in the status column. This lets you know how your employee is performing so you can help align their efforts to improve the indicator.

When their status is evaluated against some agreed-upon criteria, then you’ll be able to determine if it was “good” or “bad.” We like to use goals to establish those criteria. So, for each critical factor on a scorecard, you’ll establish three goal levels: minimum, satisfactory and outstanding. The minimum goal is the level below whichever performance is not acceptable. Satisfactory is the level that would cause you to feel good about their performance, and outstanding is the level of excellence.

For some factors, such as “number of units produced,” more is better. For other factors, such as “percent of scrap,” less is better. This is the reason you need to set a “Min or Max goal.” This way, you can identify acceptable performance as being higher than the minimum level or lower than the maximum level depending on the factor type. With these criteria, you can determine three scenarios:

  1. Excellent performance when the status is better than the out­standing goal.
  2. Good performance or positive exception when the status is better than the satisfactory goal.
  3. Bad performance or negative exception when the status is worse than the minimum goal.

In addition to the “status” and “goals,” another important information is the “trend.” The trend shows whether an employee’s status is getting better or worse. For example, their performance last month could be worse than the minimum, but the trend over the past five periods could be good. Conversely, their performance last month could be better than satisfactory, but the trend could be bad. This is useful information.

Filling in Focus Reports for your employees is a rewarding exercise. It allows you to reflect more deeply on the success factors you’ve assigned to them, the formula that defines them, the data that goes into their calculation and the positive action they’ll require.

The Feedback Report

The second report is called the Feedback Report. This report is a summary of the “good news” and the “bad news” based on the status of your employee’s indicators. It illustrates the factors that have fallen below the unacceptable range in status and those that are above the satisfactory level. Those that fall in between the two are considered in the acceptable range.

This report also illustrates the number of time periods in a row that the factor has been better than the satisfactory goal or worse than the Min/Max goal. At a glance, you can see the feedback on their performance. Try constructing Feedback Reports for each of your employees. Look at each factor in their Focus Report and compare their status with the goals you set for them. Note whether it’s better than the satisfactory goal or worse than the Min/Max goal. You should also note how many times in a row this factor has performed better than the satisfactory goal or worse than the Min/Max goal.

The Management Report

As a manager, you’ll need to know the reality of what’s happening in your pyramid of responsibility, from the bottom up and the top down. To do this, you can study the individual Focus Reports of those who report to you directly and indirectly, although this could be time consuming and inefficient. To give you performance info in a more useful way, there’s a third report, the Management Report, that gives you a quick overview of the highlights of the Feedback Reports of everyone in your pyramid of responsibility, people reporting to you directly as well as indirectly.

This approach is “management by exception.” What does that mean? People who are performing within the acceptable range won’t show up on this report — they’re doing satisfactory work and, at this time, you have little need to address their individual performance. But the star performers, as well as those who are having challenges, will show up. You’re looking for the exceptions on either end of the performance spectrum in this report. Obviously, reporting all the exceptions in the Management Report would crowd this report and diminish its effectiveness. Therefore, an escalation scheme is embedded in the reporting system to determine what exceptions get reported upwards.

Based on an escalation rule that’s customizable, positive and negative exceptions rise when they’re recurring. The rule we recommend is two or more consecutive exceptions worse than the Min/Max level or above the satisfactory level to start climbing to the next level. Beyond that, the speed of escalation upwards depends on the importance of the factor. Some can go up quickly to the next level after three consecutive exceptions and some more slowly.

The rationale for the escalation rule is that, for example, a supervisor who has a problem with returns might have a short time to resolve it. If they don’t, then notice of the problem is escalated. The boss has a predetermined length of time to help them fix it. If the problem continues, then the next level up is alerted and so on up the line. If this is a severe problem, and no one seems to have the answer, then the top person in the organization finds out about it. It’s most likely a systemic issue that’s outside the control of the supervisor who’s receiving the blame. When the problem shows up on your Management Report, you know that everyone has attempted to solve it. Now you have the opportunity to intervene and get the issue resolved.

You’ll also get the good news: With the Management Report, performance is transparent. Outstanding performance is reported upward, and the right person is recognized.


This article was originally published on Entrepreneur.